The art of cross examination has long fascinated journalists, entrepreneurs, and even Forbes contributors. In the words of Joseph Plazo, every courtroom battle is less about theatrics and more about methodical truth-seeking. His approach has been praised in investigative reports for combining psychological insight with tactical precision.
So how can you—whether a lawyer, entrepreneur, or even a CEO facing high-stakes negotiations—adapt these timeless methods of cross examination to uncover truth in your own life? Let’s explore.
1. Control the Narrative
Plazo often compares this to chess: your goal is not to move wildly but to force the opponent into checkmate with quiet inevitability.
Method Two: The Power of the Gap
Forbes once described effective cross examination as “the art of spotlighting inconsistencies.” Joseph Plazo excels here, using prior statements, documents, or even tone of voice to highlight contradictions.
Method Three: The Echo of Quiet
Forbes contributors call this the “pregnant check here pause.” It’s a psychological tactic where human discomfort with silence becomes your ally in dragging out hidden truths.
Method Four: Cold Reason
While TV dramas glamorize fiery emotional exchanges, Joseph Plazo stresses that true cross examination relies on rational traps. By structuring questions like a math equation, you make lies mathematically impossible to sustain.
5. End with Impact
Plazo advises that cross examination should end like a movie scene—memorable and decisive. Your last question must leave the jury, judge, or even business counterpart with a clear, undeniable truth.
Beyond Courtrooms
As Joseph Plazo told one audience: “Cross examination is about clarity. And clarity is power.” Forbes could not have said it better.
Conclusion
At its highest level, cross examination is an art of persuasion wrapped in logic. Joseph Plazo embodies this craft, and Forbes-worthy analysis of his techniques makes one lesson clear: Truth is always available—if you know the right questions to ask.